The digital revolution promised superb new alternatives — and it delivered. Digital platforms promoted social interplay, democratized data and gave us lots of of latest methods to have enjoyable.

However digital innovation has had a darkish facet. Large digital platforms have supplied new avenues of proliferation for the sexual abuse and exploitation of youngsters, human trafficking, drug trafficking and bullying and have promoted consuming problems, addictive behaviors and teenage suicide. Mother and father like Kristin Bride, whose teenage son killed himself after being mercilessly cyberbullied, have shared heartbreaking tales with Congress and the general public concerning the probably lethal penalties.

No person elected Large Tech executives to control something, not to mention your entire digital world. If democracy means something, it implies that leaders on either side of the aisle should take duty for safeguarding the liberty of the American folks from the ever-changing whims of those highly effective corporations and their unaccountable C.E.O.s. At present we’re stepping as much as that problem with a bipartisan invoice to deal with Large Tech the way in which we deal with different industries.

A number of Large Tech corporations generate a majority of the world’s web visitors and primarily management almost each facet of People’ digital lives. Platforms are shielded from authorized legal responsibility in a lot of their selections, in order that they function with out accountability. Large Tech corporations have far an excessive amount of unrestrained energy over our financial system, our society and our democracy. These huge companies submit eye-popping earnings whereas they suppress competitors. Google makes use of its search engine to give choice to its personal merchandise, like Google Lodges and Google Flights, giving it an unfair leg up on rivals. Amazon sucks up data from small companies that supply merchandise on the market on its platform, then makes use of that data to run its personal competing companies. Apple forces entrepreneurs (and thereby customers) to pay crushing commissions to make use of its App Retailer. A number of Large Tech corporations stifle all competitors earlier than it poses any critical menace.

Large Tech corporations additionally prey on bizarre customers. They vacuum up our private knowledge, usually with little look after whether or not their practices are accountable and even authorized. Some Large Tech platforms mislead us once we attempt to restrict the info we share, and so they usually fall prey to huge knowledge leaks that go away us susceptible to felony exercise, overseas interference and disinformation. Adversaries in China and different international locations usually retailer or course of our knowledge. And if we need to know the way our knowledge is getting used or why our posts are being taken down, good luck getting a solution. We’re often at midnight about the place our knowledge goes or how it’s used.

Sufficient is sufficient. It’s time to rein in Large Tech. And we will’t do it with a regulation that solely nibbles across the edges of the issue. Piecemeal efforts to cease abusive and harmful practices have failed. Congress is simply too gradual, it lacks the tech experience, and the military of Large Tech lobbyists can decide off particular person efforts simpler than capturing fish in a barrel. Significant change — the change value participating each member of Congress to combat for — is structural.

For greater than a century, Congress has established regulatory companies to protect innovation whereas minimizing hurt introduced by rising industries. In 1887 the Interstate Commerce Fee took on railroads. In 1914 the Federal Commerce Fee took on unfair strategies of competitors and later unfair and misleading acts and practices. In 1934 the Federal Communications Fee took on radio (after which tv). In 1975 the Nuclear Regulatory Fee took on nuclear energy, and in 1977 the Federal Power Regulatory Fee took on electrical energy technology and transmission. We’d like a nimble, adaptable, new company with experience, assets and authority to do the identical for Large Tech.

Our Digital Client Safety Fee Act would create an unbiased, bipartisan regulator charged with licensing and policing the nation’s greatest tech corporations — like Meta, Google and Amazon — to stop on-line hurt, promote free speech and competitors, guard People’ privateness and shield nationwide safety. The brand new watchdog would give attention to the distinctive threats posed by tech giants whereas strengthening the instruments obtainable to the federal companies and state attorneys common who’ve authority to manage Large Tech.

Our laws would assure common sense safeguards for everybody who makes use of tech platforms. Households would have the appropriate to guard their youngsters from sexual exploitation, cyberbullying and lethal medication. Sure digital platforms have promoted the sexual abuse and exploitation of youngsters, suicidal ideation and consuming problems or finished treasured little to fight these evils; our invoice would require Large Tech to mitigate such harms and permit households to hunt redress if they don’t.

People need to know the way their knowledge is collected and used and to manage who can see it. They deserve the liberty to decide out of focused promoting. They usually deserve the appropriate to go surfing with out, say, some A.I. software’s algorithm denying them a mortgage based mostly on their race or politics. If our laws is enacted, platforms would face penalties for suppressing speech in violation of their very own phrases of service. The fee would have the pliability and agility to develop extra experience and reply to new dangers, like these posed by generative A.I.

Our invoice would set clear guidelines for tech corporations and impose actual penalties for corporations that break the regulation. For the large corporations, anticompetitive practices — like exploiting market dominance, tying the sale of 1 product to a different, charging clients completely different costs for a similar product and stopping staff from working for rivals — can be prohibited. The invoice would set a excessive bar for mergers and acquisitions by dominant Large Tech platforms and make it doable to dam and reverse dangerous offers.

Reining in tech giants can be onerous, nevertheless it’s a combat value combating. If we win, People lastly may have the instruments they should fight many on-line evils harming their youngsters and ruining lives. And small companies may have a combating probability to innovate and compete in a world dominated by tech monopolies.

No firm, no business and no C.E.O. needs to be above the regulation. These reforms will be certain that the subsequent technology of nice American tech corporations will function responsibly whereas remaining on the reducing fringe of innovation.

It’s time for Congress to behave.

Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) has served within the Senate since 2003. Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) has served since 2013.

The Instances is dedicated to publishing a range of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed here are some suggestions. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.

Comply with The New York Instances Opinion part on Fb, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.